Qué hay que saber
- Situational leadership is a model that emphasizes adaptability, urging leaders to adjust their approach depending on the maturity, competence, and motivation of their team members.
- Rather than seeing leadership as a rigid set of traits, situational leadership highlights the interaction between the leader, the team, and the context.
- Paul Hersey, a professor of leadership, and Ken Blanchard, author of The One Minute Manager, collaborated to design a model that addressed a critical limitation in leadership studies.
Introduction: The Relevance of Situational Leadership Today
In the dynamic landscape of modern organizations, leaders can no longer rely on a single leadership style. Change, uncertainty, and complexity demand flexibility, and this is where situational leadership comes into play. Situational leadership is a model that emphasizes adaptability, urging leaders to adjust their approach depending on the maturity, competence, and motivation of their team members.
Rather than seeing leadership as a rigid set of traits, situational leadership highlights the interaction between the leader, the team, and the context. It allows managers to inspire, support, and guide their employees by calibrating their involvement and decision-making. For executives, HR professionals, and aspiring leaders, understanding situational leadership is a critical skill that fosters engagement, productivity, and resilience in times of change.
What is Situational Leadership?
Situational leadership is a flexible approach to managing teams where leaders adjust their style according to the development level of their followers. Originally introduced by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard in the late 1960s, the model is built on the principle that there is no single “best” leadership style. Instead, effectiveness arises from aligning leadership behavior with the needs of individuals or groups in specific circumstances.
At its core, situational leadership emphasizes two key dimensions of leadership behavior:
- Directive behavior: the extent to which a leader provides structure, guidance, and clear instructions.
- Supportive behavior: the extent to which a leader listens, encourages, and facilitates collaboration.
By balancing these dimensions, leaders can adapt to the readiness and competence of their team members, ensuring maximum effectiveness.
The Origins of Situational Leadership
Situational leadership was first developed through the Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory. Paul Hersey, a professor of leadership, and Ken Blanchard, author of The One Minute Manager, collaborated to design a model that addressed a critical limitation in leadership studies: the lack of flexibility in existing theories.
Previous leadership frameworks often categorized leaders into rigid styles, such as autocratic, democratic, or laissez-faire. However, Hersey and Blanchard argued that leaders need to be versatile, adjusting their approach based on:
- The task being performed.
- The individual’s competence (skills and experience).
- The individual’s commitment (motivation and confidence).
This was groundbreaking because it shifted the focus from the leader’s personality to the leader’s behavior in context. It also aligned with emerging management practices that valued empowerment and development of employees.
The Four Leadership Styles in Situational Leadership
Situational leadership defines four distinct leadership styles, each suitable for different situations:
Telling (S1)
- High directive, low supportive
The leader provides explicit instructions and closely supervises performance.
This style works best when team members lack skills or experience but need strong guidance.
Example: A new employee learning how to operate machinery in a factory.
Selling (S2)
- High directive, high supportive
Here, the leader explains decisions, persuades, and provides encouragement.
It is ideal when employees have some competence but still require motivation and clarity.
Example: A junior marketer who understands the basics but needs confidence and coaching.
Participating (S3)
- Low directive, high supportive
The leader shares decision-making and encourages input, focusing on relationships rather than control.
This approach is effective when employees have the ability but lack confidence or need emotional support.
Example: A skilled software developer struggling with impostor syndrome.
Delegating (S4)
- Low directive, low supportive
The leader entrusts tasks entirely to capable and motivated team members.
This style empowers employees, giving them autonomy while the leader monitors results.
Example: A senior project manager leading a client initiative independently.
The Development Levels of Team Members
The other key component of situational leadership is the development level of the team members. Leaders must diagnose where their followers stand in terms of competence and commitment:
- D1 (Low competence, high commitment): Enthusiastic beginners who lack skills but are eager to learn.
- D2 (Some competence, low commitment): Learners who have acquired basic skills but feel uncertain or discouraged.
- D3 (High competence, variable commitment): Capable individuals who may lack confidence or motivation.
- D4 (High competence, high commitment): Self-reliant achievers who can perform tasks independently.
The leader’s job is to match the appropriate style (S1–S4) with the development level (D1–D4) of each team member. This ensures alignment between leadership behavior and team readiness.
Benefits of Situational Leadership
Situational leadership offers significant advantages for modern organizations:
Flexibility
Unlike rigid leadership theories, situational leadership allows leaders to adapt based on context, employee needs, and business goals.
Employee Development
By adjusting their style, leaders foster growth, guiding employees from beginners to confident achievers.
Improved Performance
Teams perform better when leadership is aligned with their level of competence and motivation, reducing errors and increasing productivity.
Stronger Relationships
Leaders who practice situational leadership build trust and loyalty by showing empathy and understanding toward employees.
Criticisms and Limitations of Situational Leadership
While situational leadership is highly influential, it is not without criticism:
- Ambiguity in assessment: Determining an employee’s development level can be subjective.
- Leader adaptability: Not all leaders can easily switch between styles.
- Lack of cultural context: The model may overlook how national or organizational culture influences leadership.
- Focus on individuals over systems: Situational leadership emphasizes the leader–follower dynamic but less on broader organizational structures.
Despite these limitations, situational leadership remains widely taught in leadership development programs worldwide.
Situational Leadership in Practice
Situational leadership is applied across industries and contexts, from corporate management to education, healthcare, and the military. Examples include:
- Corporate teams: Managers adjust their style depending on whether employees are interns, mid-level staff, or senior executives.
- Healthcare: Nurses and doctors often require directive leadership in emergencies but participative leadership in research or innovation.
- Education: Teachers use situational leadership by guiding beginners step by step and encouraging advanced learners to explore independently.
- Military: Commanders rely on directive approaches in battle but foster participative styles in training.
How to Become a Situational Leader
To develop situational leadership skills, leaders can follow these steps:
Diagnose Development Levels
Evaluate your team members’ competence and commitment accurately. Use feedback, observation, and performance metrics.
Practice Flexibility
Be ready to shift from directive to supportive behavior depending on circumstances. Avoid over-relying on one style.
Communicate Clearly
Situational leadership thrives on transparent communication. Make expectations clear while remaining approachable.
Build Emotional Intelligence
Understanding motivation, fears, and confidence levels requires strong emotional awareness and empathy.
Provide Continuous Feedback
Offer constructive, supportive, and developmental feedback to help employees move up the development ladder.
The Future of Situational Leadership
In an era of remote work, digital transformation, and globalized teams, situational leadership is more relevant than ever. Virtual teams often include members at different stages of competence and confidence, making flexibility essential.
Moreover, the rise of artificial intelligence and automation means leaders must not only guide human employees but also rethink how technology fits into leadership models. Situational leadership provides the adaptability needed to thrive in this complex environment.
FAQs About Situational Leadership
It is a flexible leadership style where leaders adjust their behavior according to the competence and commitment of their team members.
Because it allows leaders to adapt to changing circumstances, motivate employees effectively, and improve organizational performance.
Telling, Selling, Participating, and Delegating.
Yes. It is highly effective in remote work environments, where team members often vary in skills, confidence, and motivation.
It was developed by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard in the late 1960s.
Conclusion
Situational leadership represents one of the most practical and widely applicable leadership models. Its focus on adaptability makes it highly relevant in today’s fast-changing environment. By mastering the ability to shift styles according to the development of their team members, leaders can cultivate stronger relationships, increase engagement, and achieve outstanding results.
In short, situational leadership is not about the leader, but about the context and the people being led. Leaders who embrace this flexibility will be better equipped to thrive in complexity and uncertainty.
